Celebrate Freedom and Preserve Independence – Domainers Are Strongly
Urged to Comment on the IRT Report and
Attend an ICANN New gTLD Consultation
“The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” – Thomas Jefferson
As
U.S. Citizens prepare to mark the 233rd
anniversary of the signing of the
Declaration of Independence on July 4th,
those in the global domain industry might
well consider giving effect to
Jefferson’s words, and acting to
preserve their own freedom and
independence, by taking the time to submit
comments to ICANN regarding the
Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT)
Report and by considering attendance at an
upcoming ICANN Consultation on the new
gTLD program.
The
deadline for submitting comments on the
IRT Report has been extended to Monday,
July 6th. Background
information and links to the final Report
can be found at http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-4-29may09-en.htm;
comments should be submitted to [email protected]
. While each individual should focus on
those aspects of the Report of greatest
concern to him, major points that will be
made in the comment letter being prepared
by the
ICA
are:
·
The IRT operated in
violation of ICANN Bylaws requirements for
maximum transparency and fair
representation. It voted to operate
confidentiality; its agenda and membership
was controlled by the Intellectual
Property Constituency (IPC); and it
included no members of the domain
investment community. Not surprisingly,
its recommendations lack balance and
constitute proposed UDRP reform undertaken
solely from the perspective of
complainants.
·
The Uniform Rapid Suspension
(URS) proposal would effectively displace
the UDRP at all new gTLDs and
substantially diminish registrants’
procedural and substantive due process
rights. The extreme low cost of filing
complaints (as little as $1.50 per domain
in mass filings) and the lack of effective
sanctions (abusive complainants barred
from the URS for one year, and then only
after three separate incidents of abuse,
with no monetary sanctions or
indemnification requirements) would
encourage abusive complaint filings. There
is also a lack of effective or affordable
substantive appeals procedures for
registrants who believe that their domains
have been unfairly suspended. Further,
trademark interests have already voiced
the goal of imposing the URS on incumbent
gTLDs, including .com, soon after its
adoption for new gTLDs.
·
Other report
recommendations, such as the Globally
Protected Marks List (GPML), appear to be
both infeasible and have no basis in
existing trademark law; their adoption
would impermissibly expand ICANN’s
function to that of a DNS treaty
organization or legislature.
·
While the domain investment
community is willing to engage
constructively with trademark interests,
that must occur through a standard but
expedited
ICANN Policy Development Process (PDP)
that is open to all affected interests,
transparent in its operation, and balanced
in its membership and recommendations.
This can result in UDRP reforms applicable
to both new and incumbent gTLDs that
provide redress to the current problems
and abuses faced by both registrants and
complainants. It would be an unacceptable
precedent to allow a single ICANN
constituency to control a short term, ad
hoc group and have its skewered policy
recommendations implemented absent further
review and input by the broad ICANN
community.
The
close of the comment period is not the end
of this process. On Monday, July 13th
ICANN will hold in
New York City
the first of four full day global
consultations on the new gTLD program,
free and open to all who have
pre-registered, with a focus on trademark
protection and the potential for malicious
behavior. The NYC consultation will be
followed by one in
London
on July 15th;
Hong Kong
on July 24th; and Abu-Dhabi on
August 4th. Information about
these consultations and a link to the
pre-registration page can be found at http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/consultation-outreach-en.htm
. We know that the trademark community is
actively encouraging its members to attend
and speak out at these consultations, so
it is vitally important that the domain
investment community, as well as the many
other constituencies and organizations
that have raised strong concerns about the
IRT process and recommendations, be in
attendance as well.
ICANN
Counsel Philip Corwin is planning to
attend the NYC consultation and would
appreciate being advised by those in the
domainer community and other groups
concerned by the IRT Report who are
planning to attend – he can be reached
by e-mail at [email protected].
Freedom
is never free. Please take the time this
weekend to send a comment to ICANN, and
please consider attending one of the
upcoming global consultations – because
those who would diminish registrant rights
are already planning to do so.
|